Skip to content
MS-Logo-UP
Client Reviews

1.800.481.2180

  • Contact Us
  • Home
  • Blog
  • What We Do
    • Business Compliance Services
    • Business & Contracts
      • Choosing a Business Lawyer for NC Corporations and Other Small Business
      • The Number One Problem for Small Limited Liability Companies
      • How To Dissolve a Corporation in North Carolina?
      • 5 Considerations as to Your Business’ Negative Internet Review
      • (Part 2) 5 Considerations as to Your Business’ Negative Internet Review
      • (Part 3) 5 Considerations as to Your Business’ Negative Internet Review
      • (Part 4) 5 Considerations as to Your Business’ Negative Internet Review
      • (Part 5) 5 Considerations as to Your Business’ Negative Internet Review
      • Are Negative Reviews Really Bad for Business?
    • Limited Liability Company
      • Your New LLC – Part 1: The Basics
      • New LLC: Maintaining Limited Liability Protection
      • Your New LLC – Part 3: Federal, State and Local Registration, Licensing and Permitting
      • “Your New LLC” – Part 4: Transacting Business in Another State
      • “Your New LLC” – Part 5: Moving Your LLC to Another State
    • Mortgage & Foreclosure
      • Hearing Results
      • Mortgage Problems – Should You Trust Your Lender or Loan Servicer?
      • When to Hire an Attorney for Foreclosure and Mortgage Relief
      • Mortgage Loans: Recourse versus Non-Recourse and Foreclosure Related Deficiency Judgments
      • Negotiating with a Bank: Why do I have to Provide My Financials?
      • Can the HOA (Homeowners’ Association) Foreclose on my Home?
    • Real Estate Cases
      • Breach of NC Real Estate Purchase Contract – Buyer’s Damages in NorthCarolina
      • Private Mortgage Insurance (PMI) – What is the Borrower Really Paying for?
    • Real Estate Closings
    • Disputes & Lawsuits
      • Business Contracts: What Should Yours Say Regarding Recovering Attorneys’ Fees in Case of Dispute? (Part 1)
      • Business Contracts: What Should Yours Say Regarding Recovering Attorneys’ Fees in Case of Dispute? (Part 2)
      • Arbitration versus Mediation
      • Responding to a Lawsuit Complaint
    • Tax & IRS Matters
      • S-Corp Tax Election for LLC
      • Comparison of Subchapter K v. Subchapter S
      • Employment Tax Considerations in Starting a Business
      • Is your Worker an Independent Contractor? (The IRS Cares!)
    • Wills, Trusts & Estate Planning
      • Congrats, You’ve Inherited a Mess
      • When Should I Write a Will?
      • Top 5 Reasons to Change Your Will
    • Prenuptial Agreements
      • Recently Engaged? 5 Reasons Why You Should Consider A Prenup
    • Other Practice Areas
      • Indemnification in Contracts: What if Both Parties Are at Fault?
      • Indemnification in Contracts: Should You at Least Have to be Guilty as Charged?
      • Venue Clauses in Contracts – Beware Listing Only the County and State
    • Limited Scope Services
      • Arbitration Agreement: How to Get to Arbitration if A Lawsuit Was Filed First
      • Follow the Contract’s Arbitration Clause or File a Lawsuit?
      • Arbitration: setting the rules and identifying which arbitration organization will be used
      • Why does your Corporation or Company Need a Registered Agent?
  • Who We Are
    • Jason A. McGrath
    • James M. Spielberger
    • Kelly J. Brown
    • Todd E. Gonyer
    • Trent Grissom
  • Where We Practice
  • Client Services
    • Helpful Resources
    • News & Updates
  • Consultations
    • About McGrath & Spielberger’s Intake Form

Category: foreclosure

North Carolina Mortgage Servicers & the Duty to Disclose Fees

Posted on June 5, 2019May 2, 2022 by g83js92js91
Categories: foreclosure, homeowners, Lenders & Mortgage Loan Servicers, North Carolina
       As an experienced real estate, mortgage servicing, and foreclosure attorney, the issue of mortgage loan servicers’ failure to assess fees and notify borrowers in North Carolina is a problem area that I have encountered a significant number of times. North Carolina General Statute § 45-91  is set up to help borrowers understand fees that are assessed to their loans and to get timely notice of them.

       Every mortgage loan servicer must comply with this statute on every loan it services in North Carolina. The law does not limit this notice to loans that are in default or borrowers that have filed a bankruptcy. Pursuant to the law, the mortgage loan servicer must:

  • Assess any fee on the account within forty-five (45) days of it being incurred; and
  • Send a clear and concise written statement to the borrower, at their last known mailing address, within thirty (30) days of assessing the fee
North Carolina law, mortgage loan servicer, mortgage fees, North Carolina General Statute 45 91

       Any failure by the mortgage servicer to comply with this law is deemed a waiver of the right to collect the fee from the borrower. This law is applicable to all fees assessed to a mortgage loan, including things like foreclosure fees, attorney’s fees, property inspections, property preservation fees, and any other fees permitted under the terms of the Promissory Note and Deed of Trust.

       Oftentimes, mortgage loan servicers include fees on the monthly statement mailed to borrowers. It is important that you view these statements to make sure you understand the fees and that everything assessed to your loan was done within the required timeframes. When borrowers have a loan go into default or file bankruptcy, mortgage loan servicers often stop sending periodic statements or notices to borrowers. Under North Carolina law, the mortgage servicer must still comply with this law or it waives the right to collect the fees. Please note that the waiver is only for fees that were not properly assessed and communicated, you will still be responsible for the principal, interest, and any escrow amounts due under the loan.

       A mortgage servicer’s failure to comply with this law can reduce amounts it claims you owe when trying to pay off a loan, or reinstate a loan that got behind on payments, or when you file bankruptcy. If you are struggling to pay your mortgage or are already behind, please feel free to contact our office for assistance.

      Key Excerpts from the statute are below.

N.C.G.S. § 45-91.  Assessment of fees; processing of payments; publication of statements. A servicer must comply as to every home loan, regardless of whether the loan is considered in default or the borrower is in bankruptcy or the borrower has been in bankruptcy, with the following requirements:

(1) Any fee that is incurred by a servicer shall be both:

       a. Assessed within 45 days of the date on which the fee was incurred. Provided, however, that attorney or trustee fees and costs incurred as a result of a foreclosure action shall be assessed within 45 days of the date they are charged by either the attorney or trustee to the servicer.

       b. Explained clearly and conspicuously in a statement mailed to the borrower at the borrower’s last known address within 30 days after assessing the fee, provided the servicer shall not be required to take any action in violation of the provisions of the federal bankruptcy code. The servicer shall not be required to send such a statement for a fee that either:

             1. Is otherwise included in a periodic statement sent to the borrower that meets the requirements of paragraphs (b), (c), and (d) of 12 C.F.R. § 1026.41.

             2. Results from a service that is affirmatively requested by the borrower, is paid for by the borrower at the time the service is provided, and is not charged to the borrower’s loan account.

(3) Failure to charge the fee or provide the information within the allowable time and in the manner required under subdivision (1) of subsection (a) of this section constitutes a waiver of such fee.

litigation2Bscales2Bof2Bjustice

Posted in foreclosure, homeowners, Lenders & Mortgage Loan Servicers, North Carolina

North Carolina Mortgage Foreclosure Process – Lost Loan Notes

Posted on January 24, 2019May 2, 2022 by g83js92js91
Categories: borrower, Deed in Lieu, foreclosure, Foreclosures & Mortgage Loan Relief, Jason A McGrath, loan note, lost note, mortgage, Mortgage Loan Modification, North Carolina
pen-marker-hand-the-hand_lost-loan-notes

In this video, focusing on the North Carolina foreclosure process, attorney Jason McGrath discusses how a lost loan note can affect a foreclosure proceeding.

It is important to note that foreclosures can vary greatly depending on the smallest detail. An experienced real estate contract lawyer in Charlotte NC should be able to access your particular situation and guide you toward the best possible resolution.

If you are facing a foreclosure situation in North Carolina, please fill out our confidential client intake form for legal assistance. We have staff available to assist with real estate and mortgage matters in Tennessee, North Carolina, South Carolina, Georgia, Florida, and even Ohio.

Posted in borrower, Deed in Lieu, foreclosure, Foreclosures & Mortgage Loan Relief, Jason A McGrath, loan note, lost note, mortgage, Mortgage Loan Modification, North Carolina

Legal Judgments – Can They Be Negotiated

Posted on August 29, 2018April 21, 2022 by g83js92js91
Categories: attorney, Business Law & Contracts, Business Law Disputes, Collections, Credit, Debt, foreclosure, Foreclosures amp; Mortgage Loan Relief, Jason A McGrath, judgment, Judgments, lawsuit
pen marker hand the hand legal judgement

In this video attorney Jason McGrath discusses some options when negotiating legal judgments between opposing parties in a lawsuit.

https://youtu.be/JruiKGTNbts


If you are in need of legal assistance with a Legal Judgment in North Carolina, South Carolina, Tennessee, Georgia or Florida please fill out our confidential client intake form.

Posted in attorney, Business Law & Contracts, Business Law Disputes, Collections, Credit, Debt, foreclosure, Foreclosures amp; Mortgage Loan Relief, Jason A McGrath, judgment, Judgments, lawsuit

Being Sued by a Mortgage Insurance Company for an Insurance Policy you Paid for?

Posted on May 28, 2018April 21, 2022 by g83js92js91
Categories: CitiMortgage, Deed in Lieu, foreclosure, homeowners, Jason A McGrath, Life and the Law, mortgage loan, North Carolina, PMI, private mortgage insurance, Private Mortgage Insurance (PMI), Real Estate, short sale

As attorneys who provide a variety of real estate and mortgage related services, including foreclosures and post-foreclosure disputes, we know that many (most?) borrowers really don’t understand private mortgage insurance. Known as PMI, private mortgage insurance is to benefit the lender, not the borrower – even though the borrower is paying for it.

What makes it worse from the borrower’s perspective is that, in addition to being foreclosed on, a borrower can end up being sued by the mortgage insurance company in relation to the very same policy the borrower paid for. The highly technical terms we use to describe this include:

Technical terms

We’ve advised and defended borrowers in these cases. The most common fact scenario is this one:

  • a foreclosure takes place (or sometimes even a short sale or a deed-in-lieu of foreclosure);

 

  • the loan is not paid off in full;

 

  • the creditor (lender / loan note holder) makes a claim against the private mortgage insurance policy;

 

  • the mortgage insurance company pays the creditor to reimburse it for its losses on the loan;

 

  • the mortgage insurance company sues the borrower / former homeowner, under the theory of “We only had to pay out on this policy because you didn’t pay the loan off in full, so you owe us”; and
  • the borrower is shocked, comes to us for help.

We’ve seen cases in which the mortgage insurance company may not actually have paid out the money it was seeking to recover, in which the mortgage insurance company was unable to even produce the insurance policy at issue, and in which the borrower has been assured by the persons involved in the deal (before our involvement) that the borrower was going to be “free and clear” after a foreclosure, short sale, or deed-in-lieu. However, we’ve also seen cases in which the borrower did appear to legally owe the monies being sought by the insurance company.

These cases usually – in our experience and based on our assistance – go away without the borrower having to pay what the mortgage insurance company is seeking. However, each case and each client is different, and no guarantees or predictions can be made. The bottom line is that anyone wanting to reach a settlement with the lender / note holder before the property is disposed of and anyone who has been notified of a claim against them related to PMI should be educated and informed and perhaps seek professional assistance. 

McGrath & Spielberger, PLLC provides legal services in Florida, Georgia, North Carolina, Ohio, South Carolina, and Tennessee, as well as in some Federal courts. The Firm offers full scale representation, as well as limited scope services, as appropriate for the situation. Please be advised that the content on this website is not legal advice, but rather informational, and no attorney-client relationship is formed without the express agreement of this law firm. Thank you.
Posted in CitiMortgage, Deed in Lieu, foreclosure, homeowners, Jason A McGrath, Life and the Law, mortgage loan, North Carolina, PMI, private mortgage insurance, Private Mortgage Insurance (PMI), Real Estate, short sale

Foreclosure Hearing – Mecklenburg County NC – Wells Fargo

Posted on November 8, 2017April 21, 2022 by g83js92js91
Categories: foreclosure, Foreclosure Hearing Results, foreclosure prevention, loss mitigation, mortgage dispute, mortgage relief, Wells Fargo
Depositphotos 18697169 original

 

The following is a summary of a foreclosure hearing that McGrath & Spielberger assisted a borrower with, and is provided for informational purposes only. Each case, each client, each situation is different, and each matter may have a different outcome.

Mortgage Loan Servicer / Foreclosing Bank: Wells Fargo; Wells Fargo Bank NA

Prosecuting Trustee / Law Firm: Shapiro & Ingle, LLP

Property Location: Charlotte, Mecklenburg County, North Carolina

Property Type: Primary Residence

Borrower’s Attorney: Jason McGrath, Esq.

Hearing Date: 11/2017

Actions Taken by McGrath & Spielberger on Behalf of Client in Relation to the Foreclosure Hearing: Mr. McGrath attended the foreclosure hearing with the client and negotiated a Motion to Continue to the court in order to help client avoid foreclosure.

Foreclosure Hearing Outcome: Mr. McGrath successfully moved to continue the hearing; foreclosure avoided.

⏹

If you are facing home foreclosure Charlotte NC or Mt Pleasant SC, seek assistance from McGrath & Spielberger today. Many homeowners do not know that foreclosures can often be avoided. Our attorneys are here to be your advocate through these tough times and will work to get you the best possible outcome.

Find related helpful resources on our website at
McGrathSpielberger.com/online-resources/helpful-resources/mortgage-loan-and-real-estate-related-resources/

Posted in foreclosure, Foreclosure Hearing Results, foreclosure prevention, loss mitigation, mortgage dispute, mortgage relief, Wells Fargo

Foreclosure Hearing – RoundPoint Mortgage Servicing Corp – Charlotte-NC

Posted on November 18, 2016October 6, 2022 by g83js92js91
Categories: Charlotte, foreclosure, foreclosure hearing, Foreclosure Hearing Results, Foreclosures amp; Mortgage Loan Relief, Jason A McGrath, mortgage relief, North Carolina, Roundpoint Mortgage

Depositphotos 18697169 original

The following is a summary of a foreclosure hearing that McGrath & Spielberger assisted a borrower with, and is provided for informational purposes only. Each case, each client, each situation is different, and each matter may have a different outcome.

Mortgage Loan Servicer / Foreclosing Bank: RoundPoint Mortgage Servicing Corporation

Prosecuting Trustee / Law Firm: Substitute Trustee Services, Inc. and Hutchens Law Firm

Property Location: Charlotte, Mecklenburg County, North Carolina

Property Type: Primary residence

Borrower’s Attorney: Jason A. McGrath, Esq.

Hearing Date: May 2016

Actions Taken by McGrath & Spielberger on Behalf of Client in Relation to the Foreclosure Hearing: Mr. McGrath attended the foreclosure hearing with the client and argued a Motion to Continue to the court in order to help client avoid foreclosure.

Foreclosure Hearing Outcome: Mr. McGrath successfully moved to continue the hearing; foreclosure avoided.

Save

Save

Posted in Charlotte, foreclosure, foreclosure hearing, Foreclosure Hearing Results, Foreclosures amp; Mortgage Loan Relief, Jason A McGrath, mortgage relief, North Carolina, Roundpoint Mortgage

NC Home Foreclosure Hearings – Should the Borrower Attend?

Posted on August 12, 2016May 2, 2022 by g83js92js91
Categories: attending a hearing, foreclosure, foreclosure hearing, Foreclosures amp; Mortgage Loan Relief, hearing attendance, Jason A McGrath, Lenders amp; Mortgage Loan Servicers, Life and the Law
In this video attorney Jason McGrath explains why a borrower should attend the foreclosure hearing in a home foreclosure occurring in North Carolina.

https://youtu.be/Xhua-sxbkLs

If you are facing a foreclosure situation in North Carolina please fill out our confidential client intake form for legal assistance.

logo2Bseal2Blarge

Posted in attending a hearing, foreclosure, foreclosure hearing, Foreclosures amp; Mortgage Loan Relief, hearing attendance, Jason A McGrath, Lenders amp; Mortgage Loan Servicers, Life and the Law

Servicemembers’ Civil Relief Act and Foreclosures

Posted on April 8, 2015April 19, 2022 by g83js92js91
Categories: foreclosure, Foreclosures amp; Mortgage Loan Relief, Jason A McGrath, McGrath amp; Spielberger, Mortgage Loan Modification, Mortgage Relief / Loss Mitigation Programs, North Carolina, SCRA
In this video, Attorney Jason McGrath of McGrath & Spielberger discusses how members of the US Armed Forces may have some specific protections and rights in relation to foreclosures and related court proceedings. Mr. McGrath and McGrath & Spielberger, PLLC handle both foreclosure cases in multiple states, including North Carolina and South Carolina.

https://youtu.be/kkxshCxt_Co

Posted in foreclosure, Foreclosures amp; Mortgage Loan Relief, Jason A McGrath, McGrath amp; Spielberger, Mortgage Loan Modification, Mortgage Relief / Loss Mitigation Programs, North Carolina, SCRA

Mortgage Loan Debt Forgiveness

Posted on March 24, 2015April 25, 2022 by g83js92js91
Categories: debt forgiveness, Deed in Lieu, foreclosure, Foreclosures & Mortgage Loan Relief, Kelly Brown, loan modification, mortgage loan debt, mortgage loan debt income, short sales, tax, Tax Issues

Is Canceled Mortgage Loan Debt Income that you are Taxed on?

As an attorney with specific tax law knowledge who also works with borrowers to avoid foreclosure and/or to otherwise resolve mortgage loan problems, I deal with short sales, deeds in lieu of foreclosure, loan modifications, and mortgage loan settlements on a regular basis. Borrowers are usually thrilled to be able to get rid of unwanted mortgage debt either through disposing of the property, as part of a discounted pay off which allows them to keep the property, or in the form of a principal reduction as part of a modification. However, the mortgage loan debt canceled as a result of these types of transactions can have negative future tax consequences for the borrower.

Generally, canceled or reduced mortgage principal is treated as income by the IRS, which means the amount of forgiven/reduced debt would normally be taxable income to the borrower. However, the Federal Government enacted the Mortgage Forgiveness Debt Relief Act of 2007 (the “Act”) to exclude up to $2 million of forgiven debt on a taxpayer’s primary residence from taxable income. This type of forgiven debt is specifically referred to as “Qualified Principal Residence Indebtedness”. The Act has been extended several times, with the most recent extension occurring in January 2015 to retroactively cover 2014, meaning that certain mortgage debt which was canceled or forgiven in 2014 need not be included as income to the borrower. 

North Carolina and South Carolina have different approaches on these matters as far as state income taxes. In most recent years, North Carolina followed the Federal Government’s lead and enacted legislation to exclude Qualified Principal Residence Indebtedness from a taxpayer’s income for state tax purposes. The North Carolina state exclusion expired in 2013 (just like the Federal exclusion), but unlike the Federal Government, North Carolina has not yet extended the exclusion to cover 2014. Thus, as of the date of this writing, the exclusion currently applies to 2014 for purposes of South Carolina state income taxes but not for North Carolina state income taxes (but changes may be taking place within weeks).

The debate surrounding the debt forgiveness exclusion is a hot topic for North Carolina lawmakers. In February 2015, the North Carolina State Senate passed a bill that requires forgiven debt to be included as income. North Carolina’s initial failure to extend the exclusion and the effect on homeowners was recently discussed by McGrath & Spielberger attorney Jason McGrath when he was interviewed by the Charlotte Observer.

The bill was subsequently rewritten by the NC House of Representatives to exclude forgiven debt from income and then passed by the NC House in early March 2015. As it currently stands, a Conference Committee with members from both the Senate and the House was appointed late last week to hash out whether North Carolina will follow the lead of the IRS and allow certain forgiven mortgage loan debt to be excluded from state taxation from the borrower side for certain debt canceled in 2014. Governor McCrory, of course, can sign or refuse to sign whichever version of the bill is presented to him.

At this point, homeowners with Qualified Principal Residence Indebtedness from 2014 will be able to exclude the forgiven debt amount from Federal income tax but would have to include that amount for North Carolina state income tax purposes. Homeowners facing foreclosure and other difficult mortgage loan situations could be forced into deciding whether to keep the home or pay at least state income tax later as to any canceled mortgage loan debt.

In contrast, South Carolina closely resembles the Federal income tax laws with only a few modifications. South Carolina has simplified its tax scheme by deciding to follow the Federal government’s lead on tax laws with any differences expressly stated in the South Carolina statutes. In fact, § 12-6-40(c) of the South Carolina Code of Laws specifically states, “If Internal Revenue Code sections adopted by this State which expired or portions thereof expired on December 31, 2013, are extended, but otherwise not amended, by congressional enactment during 2014, these sections or portions thereof also are extended for South Carolina income tax purposes in the same manner that they are extended for Federal income tax purposes.” Qualified Principal Residence Indebtedness is not mentioned or excluded in the South Carolina Income Tax Act and thus, one can conclude that the retroactive extension of the Mortgage Forgiveness Debt Relief Act of 2007 by the Federal Government allows a borrower in South Carolina to exclude certain forgiven debt for South Carolina state income tax purposes.

In addition to the Qualified Principal Residence Indebtedness exclusion, borrowers, including those in both North Carolina and South Carolina may be able to exclude some or all of forgiven debt from Federal taxation under the IRS’ insolvency exemption. The insolvency exemption allows a taxpayer to exclude canceled or forgiven debt from income if the taxpayer is insolvent. A borrower is insolvent when the total of all the liabilities exceed the fair market value of all the assets immediately before the cancellation of the debt. However, a borrower can only exclude forgiven debt up to the amount he or she was insolvent. 

Whatever you do, just make sure you are fully aware of the potential consequences of your mortgage loan resolution; there’s nothing worse than a nasty tax surprise hitting you out of the blue. If you need advice regarding a tax situation, a distressed mortgage loan, or something similar, please don’t hesitate to contact us to speak to an attorney Charlotte NC and Mt Pleasant SC.

Posted in debt forgiveness, Deed in Lieu, foreclosure, Foreclosures & Mortgage Loan Relief, Kelly Brown, loan modification, mortgage loan debt, mortgage loan debt income, short sales, tax, Tax Issues

Can the HOA (Homeowners’ Association) Foreclose on my Home?

Posted on March 20, 2015April 25, 2022 by g83js92js91
Categories: foreclosure, Foreclosures amp; Mortgage Loan Relief, hoa, HOA / Homeowners' Association, homeowners' association, Jason A McGrath, McGrath amp; Speilberger, North Carolina, south carolina
In this video, Attorney Jason McGrath discusses whether the Homeowners’ Association can foreclose on your property or not. Mr. McGrath and the McGrath and Spielberger PLLC attorneys handle both “regular” and HOA foreclosure cases in multiple states, including North Carolina and South Carolina.

https://youtu.be/CQMZJjZAYPA

Posted in foreclosure, Foreclosures amp; Mortgage Loan Relief, hoa, HOA / Homeowners' Association, homeowners' association, Jason A McGrath, McGrath amp; Speilberger, North Carolina, south carolina

Posts navigation

Older posts

Categories

Recent Posts

  • Business Ownership Deals (Part 6 of Series): How Many Different Attorneys Need To Be Involved?
  • Business Ownership Deals: Buying And Selling (Transferring) Membership Interests In LLCs – Part 5, Filings With The Secretary Of State
  • Business Ownership Deals: Buying And Selling (Transferring) Membership Interests In LLCs – Part 4, Operating Agreement (“OA”) Changes
  • Business Ownership Deals: Buying And Selling (Transferring) Membership Interests In LLCs – Part 3, The Company Resolution
  • Business Ownership Deals: Buying And Selling (Transferring) Membership Interests In LLCs (Part 2)

McGrath & Spielberger, PLLC

Tweets by JasonMcGrathLaw

Sitemap

  • Contact Us
  • Home
  • Who We Are
  • Where We Practice
  • Consultations
  • Blog

What We Do

  • Business & Contract Law
  • Limited Liability Company
  • Mortgage & Foreclosure
  • Real Estate Cases
  • Disputes & Lawsuits
  • Tax & IRS Matters
  • Wills, Trusts & Estate Planning
  • Prenuptial Agreements
  • Other Practice Areas
  • Business Compliance Services

Location

Directions

Contact Us

7300 Carmel Executive Park Drive, Suite 300, Charlotte, NC 28226

info@mcgrathspielberger.com

1.800.481.2180


fb


tw


yt


ld

google

The attorneys responsible for this website are Jason McGrath and Jim Spielberger. At least some of the content of this website may be considered attorney advertising in some jurisdictions. For information about our website privacy policy and terms and conditions, please click here.

Attorney Website Design, Legal Search Engine Optimizations and Lawyer Online Advertising by Leads Online Marketing Services.